But for Google stadia I don't need any special requirements on the laptop itself or what do you think? The cool thing is that he has a 4k screen so can display 2560 times 1440 that's 4k quality right?
And what features should I pay attention to when it comes to whether it is good for gaming (even if Google Stadia is most important to me and hopefully it will work out in advance)? It is a Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon, of which there are many models on the Internet, I have already checked, with an I5 processor and a graphics card Intel HD Graphics Family. I have not found out any further details because it is quite confusing. I don't know exactly what what means or how to find out, for example I'm overwhelmed by the top qQuadcore processor and how many cores it has now. I can look through the device manager but do not understand everything and it just confuses me. I don't know the meanings, nor what is important. As I said on the Internet, I can't find anything out because there are x different versions of this laptop, which is an Ultrabook by the way (maybe that's enough to gamble just because I found it so demanding to be called Intel?), So I think I do not have a version that corresponds exactly to mine and can't yet define it precisely in terms of price and performance… And whether you could have a graphics card installed? Because this hd graphics, according to the internet, is just an "onboard" graphics card, whatever that is.
That's 2k. 4k would be X * 2160
Oh that's a shame
but at least half 4k then or how. Lol
but I did not read that it is 4k, have to look again?
Frankly i think it is more in the fullhd area.
Nope there's 4k
I just researched this laptop or Ultrabook models on the Internet, the resolution I call is 4k, 2560 by 1440
It is not intended for gaming. Rather watch a device for office work and videos.
Since it is an I5, it is also an onboard graphics card. (Intel HD)
You can't gamble a lot with it. But it is enough for low settings at Lol. I know that because I currently have an i5 only the difference that I have a separate GPU.
That would be miserable and would tarnish my hopes a bit…
but can you have a graphics card installed? Vlt would he be great then?
and I think he has a 4k resolution then he is after all extremely cool for netflix
But it is also important that he goes well for office and yes there's actually this series for people who have something to do with it, but since I will have something to do with it soon.
i5 can mean a lot
2560 x 1440 is wqhd and the notebook would not have 4k and 4k even if it was UHD 3840 x 2160.
4k = 4096 x 2160
unfortunately it has become common that everyone says about the UHD resolution 4k
No, a graphics card would not be possible with this laptop. Since I myself once owned and expanded lenovo and Samsung laptops, there's hardly any space and no connection. But the laptop is ideal for Netflix and office work. Now not for real gaming. Only games that hardly need any performance work on it. That would be Lol and World of warships as an example.
Do you think world of warcraft would go too? The joke is that those are the games that I've been interested in for a while. The right games like shooter and so I have ne ps4 and google stadia now
So actually this laptop is perfect for me, I just notice. With the long battery you can play for a long time, something like lol.
I haven't tried Google Stadia yet. But that's why there's cloud gaming. For people who don't have that much budget, cloud gaming is a blessing if you have good internet.
Pretty cool thing in my opinion, I find even the best thing about gaming and development, precisely because I never want or never wanted to spend such a large budget
I found out it had uhd 2560 by 1440 which corresponds to four times the hd, and is definitely a very good resolution, (called wqhd), okay 4k is something else. But my cell phone also has wqhd, for example, and I really have to say that it can look awesome when you do or see things that can use this quality.
WQHD is still the best choice when it comes to price / performance, a proper UHD monitor alone costs 1000 euro and more, then you also need really strong hardware to get decent FPS, the resolution is not everything
True or you can google stadia and save the hardware.
but you still need the 4k screen and if you say 1000 euro plus it will pass me haha.
I then take wqhd and am satisfied. As you say good value for money
will definitely watch nice in the qualification netflix and play google stadia. With big wqhd monitors you can get some measurements cheap or what do you think? If you say it's good value for money. And then I wouldn't have to always take the 14 inch laptop, that's not a lot
Only Stadia is not what everyone had hoped for, there's a lot of ranting
I can't complain yet. I'm still excited about the part. Vlt also because I don't have such high demands but at all. I hardly notice anything negative, I just see the positive sides and think the part will develop significantly in the future.
I would only be happy if there were more games but there are a few chic ones and that will come
And hopefully it will remain stable in price and not much more expensive.
Do you also have a google stadia?
By the way, Stadia is still in a kind of test phase because you have to buy these pre-editions to be able to gamble at all, as far as I know
Wait and see, I know it from others who have it, but I don't need it at the moment.
What do the others say?
Is it jerky for example? You can also tell that Google always wants feedback and a lot goes towards the players, that there's still a lot of potential for more and I think it will be the future of gaming. But clearly at the moment (or always) everyone can gamble as he likes and if he likes to build a PC that's nice too.
I have the feeling you just need a good internet line that is not used by others if possible and then it fits. Got pretty nice ticks at night haha
Everyone who has it has at least a 50k line
constant game crashes, no accessibility, laggs, picture hangs, the graphics only correspond to upscaled values, and and and the list is long.
even in many forums, many are not so enthusiastic.
ok if you do not have very high demands and are satisfied with less, that may be acceptable, but if things are advertised before appearance but are not followed, I can understand the excitement.
but I can also improve it, maybe it will also be a flop and I can't hold it, wait and see, no one can say for sure.
Well, I would have taken shadow because Stadia has an enormously high input. So in shooters you have massive disadvantages, and you also feel the lag. With Shadow it is so on console level, it is completely clear.
If that is the case
google has the means to do so and so far i haven't noticed anything negative in the shooter. I have one
Have never seen anyone who didn't notice Even shadow users notice it. Vll is also a matter of reaction time etc. Or Stadia has finally fixed their ping problems, which I somehow doubt
