I had an application photo taken yesterday for an interesting application. This should be sent to me as a mail, I was accommodated because I can't play a DVD with my laptop.
I had mentioned that I also urgently need the photo so that the application can go out today. It was created and paid for.
When I want to download my photo today, I realize that this is only possible if terms and conditions, apps or whatever else is previously accepted. Otherwise no download is possible. I feel that this is an intolerable impudence, especially since I had no way of accepting it because of the time factor.
I immediately objected to the consent via email. I'm no longer placing an order with this company.
Why dubious?
The non-use of terms and conditions and the disagreement with authorizations for apps etc. Would be dubious!
But you can pick up the pictures today on a USB stick in the studio. Your PC will probably have a USB input.
Do not know now what should be dubious about it. You just abide by the law.
Surely it would have been possible without a special app, and without knowing the details, you can't say much about it.
"especially since I had no way of accepting this because of the time factor.
I immediately objected to the consent via email. At this company from… "
But was there enough time to write such a long text and an email to them? And as already mentioned in the other answer, it is dubious not to disclose general terms and conditions etc., not to disclose them.
Otherwise you have no worries? On which website, where contracts are concluded, do you have to accept no terms and conditions?
What should be dubious about not using terms and conditions (please not terms and conditions)?
Whm, because the site operator and business owner can otherwise cheer you on any conditions or additional services, can continue to use your data? Just as an example, really.
No, he can't.
Of course, if he has it in the terms and conditions that he gives the data to third parties, for example for advertising purposes.
If he has something in the non-existent terms and conditions? Does that make sense in your world?
Ea is about confirming the terms and conditions and agreeing to it again, not whether there are any.
Yes, the term non-use is about the fact that none are used, so there are none.
I was not offered the opportunity.
Application photos are still made in the real world and not in the virtual world. If you sit on the PC all day, then you don't really know the real world anymore and you have to accept the terms and conditions for every yogurt you buy and download an app. I still buy my yogurt from Rewe and not from amazon. So far, as in the photo studio, where I appear personally, I have not used any terms and conditions or app. Bye bye by now. I really have to go back to the real world now so that I do not lose my sense of reality.
With the photo studio it worked out for me.
For a yogurt that I buy, I do not sign any terms and conditions. Nothing else is buying your own photo in the real world. I did not order the photo from amazon.
For a yogurt that I buy, I do not sign any terms and conditions. Nothing else is buying your own photo in the real world. I did not order the photo from amazon. I downloaded the photo, contradicted the terms and conditions and app. They can gladly give me the purchase price.
Yogurts are sold just like your own photos in the real world without terms and apps. I just didn't order it from amazon.
In the real world, every store has terms and conditions that you agree to when you enter the store, and you can view them in every store.
Man, man, man!
The photo studio sends image files of yours over the Internet and they could also be intercepted and misused.
It is not always just "application photos"! There's a data protection regulation and rightly so, which of course also has to be confirmed!
You don't have to sign anything. Best example of train travel.
This is 100% real, but your departures are signposted at every station. By using the service you give your consent
I do not care. I'm going out again. But do not feel like writing nonsense.
For a valid contract, the terms and conditions must always be accepted by both contract partners. In the shop, this happens tacitly with the completion of the payment process and delivery of the product. It is possible to view the terms and conditions in every shop. They either hang them out or they have to be shown on request.
Again: The website can't know that you already accepted the terms and conditions when paying for the photo. What you do now because of such a tick for a tear is quite disproportionate.