Hy people want to ask something I'll do forever Youtube back then I had a laptop with ner 400mb graphics card (or a chip I never know) 4gb ram and NEN 1.5 processor (4 core) and the video rendering takes the same length as mine current pc
Nvidia Geforce 1060 3gb
16gb Ram
Intel Core i7-3930k CPu with 3.20 ghz (overclocked to 3.60ghz due to k) 6core
Program: Vegas Pro 16
This is so difficult to compare, because it is of course always synonymous to the video to be rendered.
Length of the video, resolution, bitrate, possibly effects… All this influences the render time.
Length: 35 minutes and 59 seconds
Resolution: 1280x720 (60FPS)
Bitrade 5000kBit / s
Multi-track audio (micro and game sound)
First, the graphics card has little to do with it: Rendering is fully on the CPU, and sufficient RAM is not a disadvantage.
For comparison, you would have to render the identical video with both PCs: you will notice that this will be a big difference.
By the way, when rendering, the Ryzen are in the lead, as far as possible, as many cores are addressed by the program
So with the cpu I already knew ^. ^ Because in the taskmanger it is always on 100% ^. ^ But NEN colleague has a less strong pc as of ram and processor and he needs the same length as me with the same pc if we once again make a joint project and both record the same video only from the other point of view only too bad the Camtasia no multiple sound tracks supports with camtasia gings schenller
It always depends on what video editing program you use. For Vegas, it does not take as long as Adobe Premiere Pro, but it takes longer to do so, for example, than rendering with Wondershare Filmora.
I myself have worked with all three programs and had initially worked with similar specifications. However, I'm now on 16GB and I7, but have only Intel HD Graphics and support a GeForce MX250. Nevertheless, the rendering is now faster with me than on the old laptop.
I myself only use Filmora. Yes, Vegas and Premiere may have more features, but you'll notice that as well, as they consume too many resources. This will take longer, for example, to render.
Example: I recently rendered a 30 minute video on Fulll-HD. With Vegas it took about one and a half hours and with Filmora just under half an hour. Both on the same laptop, of course.
First, the graphics card has little to do with it: Rendering is fully on the CPU
that is nonsense!
Nowadays, there are programs running gracefully on the GPU because it is designed much better for such work and here creates a multiple of the power!
I now render 1 hour and 35 minutes s.ein 35 minutes of video ^ The functional initial is eigendlich me no preference since I use this only for AMV's (anime music videos) but in other editing programs, I never really tried 've tried after effect but that has my hard drive in 0, nothing fully made I have big hard drive problems ^^ 've all at only 10 gb free
That's a long time. I think it will take time, right? Just try Filmora 9. That should be enough for your purposes. Here is a link: https://filmora.wondershare.com/de/videobearbeitungsprogramm/
Does it support the multi-track recordings? So I exempt 2 soundtracks and this can then edit synonymous with Camtasia z.B it is so that it is only 1 soundtrack trozdem although I record on 2 different tracks
Okay I've downloaded the program and the next series pulled in unfortunately it is like in Camtasia I only an audio track is displayed and not two as in Vegas that is unfortunately the program then nothing for me because I have to level my mic with s and do not oversteer
Displayed or that you can record multiple audio tracks? I always work with two audio tracks. Once HG music and once the actual sound from the video. Otherwise, watch Filmora Pro. That should probably be a bit more.
Displayed I need it displayed even if I separate the soundtrack of video I have only one thing is that the raw video on different soundtracks runs and I do not insert in retrospect two audio tracks
Okay, Filmora 9 does not seem to be able to do that, but try the Filmora Pro. That should probably offer more functions. I myself had not tested it yet.
Here is the link: https://filmora.wondershare.com/de/filmorapro-video-editor/
Unfortunately synonymous with Pro Nachwievor only an audiophile after opening the raw videos But I guess I'll use the Pro version for other videos where I have only something to cut out ^. ^
But now I have solved the problem and pre-buttoned with the render settings
