There are many on the net who claim that they put products through their paces. Who does it best if it is the rubric of PCs and notebooks?
Kreativ Ecke, hardware deal, are very competent youtuber in my opinion
PCs / hardware: computerbase.de
Notebooks: notebookcheck.com
Good idea to test the testers. But who guarantees that such a test by the testers has been tested well?
stiftung warentest has for decades proven to be essentially objective, neutral and meaningful. Furthermore, you can assume that there are no really bad ones with technically complex devices, they would disappear from the market in a flash. The differences in price always relate to the equipment and performance of the built-in components. For example, nobody would In the car, the idea came up to want to compare a golf with a ferrari, although both reliably bring their occupants from A to B.
You have to find out for yourself which equipment, which performance or which optics of a notebook is best for you. In extreme cases, someone else could (subjectively) rate your favorite as "bad" because, e.g. Prefer a matte display over a glossy one.
LOL creative corner a good hardware tester? Who always only wants to hear RGB poems. Age stop. The Kasper can be interesting for children who have a PC, but not for adults.
Are you grown up i don't think so
So testing whole PCs is always a thing. Virtually nobody wants to see that. Because very few buy ready-made PCs like Medion, Acer, Asus, HP or Dell. Most buy hardware or have the hardware from certain retailers such as Then assemble hardware advice, Dubaro, Mindfactory or Alternate.
Therefore it is much more interesting to see hardware testers. And there are some good ones. For example, "IgorsLab", "Der 8auer", "PCGH", "Hardwareluxx" etc.
