Which graphics card is better for video editing with Premiere Pro (color correction, effects, LUTS, fast rendering, etc.)?
And why?
What's the difference between Quadros and Geforce when editing videos?
I would like to do full-time video editing with Premiere Pro, color correction, effects etc. No video games or 3D animations.
I have the choice between an HP (for 1550 euro) and your Dell Notebook (for 1500 euro).
The HP has an Nvidia Quadro P620 or a P1000 and the Dell has an Nvidia Geforce RTX 2060. Everything else important is the same.
Which laptop would you choose and why?
Notebooks are fundamentally critical at first, but you get further with this thing than with the other.
According to the tool here, the RTX is better in all values than the Quadro, but supposedly the Quadros are supposed to be generally better for at least 3D processing than the RTX series. But how should that work if it is by far worse in absolutely all values? https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/...1840vs4034
More like the Dell.
The DELL has the RTX 2060 and the HP the Quadro. You chose the Quadro, but are you more likely to say the DELL? What does "wealthy creative people" mean? I plan to edit videos, use effects, luts, color correction etc. With the Premiere Pro all day long. According to the tool here, the RTX is better in all values than the Quadro, but supposedly the Quadros are generally supposed to be better for at least 3D Editing than the RTX series. But how should that work if it is by far worse in absolutely all values? https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/...1840vs4034
Damn, the name says nothing and look at Adobe's single core performance.
But the Quadro is four times stronger.
The RTX has 1920 CUDA cores and the Quadro only 512 CUDA cores or the Quadro P1000, has 640. The Quadro P620 is not even listed among the recommended graphics cards, only the Quadro P1000 with its 640.
How does it work that the Quadro P1000 is 4x that strong? That is exactly what amazes me. According to the comparison, from the link, it is in absolutely all values, sometimes hundreds of percent worse than the RTX 2060. Sounds logical because the RTX 2060 has 1920 CUDA cores and the Quadro P1000 has only 640 CUDA cores.
I would choose the Quadro.
The RTX should be faster, but it will still be more accurate with the Quadro.
https://askgeek.io/en/gpus/vs/NVIDIA_GeForce-RTX-2060-vs-NVIDIA_Quadro-P620
Even Adobe itself uses an RTX 2060 for the CUDA comparison
https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2020/05/19/gpu-acceleration-adobe-premiere-pro/
Overall, a laptop has to be questioned first. Why no PC or no workstation?
Yes, the Quadro seems to be more precise, this is important for 3D draftsmen who draw for machines, but for my editing I need the picture to run smoothly, also with effects, LUTS etc. The picture can be a little inaccurate. And that rendering is as fast as possible is also important to me, whereby point 1 is much more important. A workstation because I plan to work a lot on the go, when traveling, etc. And not from a fixed place.
I don't see it as "professional" yet, but hey… Take what you are going to take anyway.
Nvidia Support has just answered the following: I quote:
"" Most of the time we recommend Quadro cards for professional applications because the Quadro cards were developed for very special rendering tasks and professional video rendering.
But in comparison of the two models you named, the RTX 2060 is based on a newer architecture (Turing) and is also significantly stronger than the Quadro P620. It is also the case that there are now studio drivers for the RTX 2060, i.e. Drivers have been adapted for professional applications.
If you choose between the P620 and the RTX 2060, I would definitely recommend the RTX 2060 as it is newer and stronger as mentioned above. ""
I have now asked again about the Quadro P1000, which I also have a choice of.
