I have a question and although my buddies and I had stress then she went and told me several times that I can sell the laptop. Now she said he belongs to her mother and I should pay him. What can I do? She wants to go to the lawyer now. But I have proof and testify that she said it.
I think I have very good basic knowledge in law. The story is too short to describe it more. Witnesses do not care. Did you buy it yourself? Or borrowed or rented by her. You can't start with your description
She left him with me and said several times to me that I can sell him because she is afraid to pick it up
The story sounds so stupid. If she disputes you have lost in any case. In the worst case you have to pay your damages and maybe also replacement costs (for renting a laptop if you think you need one for the time in which she does not have one). Did you say that you accept your gift and can you confirm that? Or did not you agree?
I do not understand the facts. What does the laptop have to do with the argument and why should you pay for the laptop? Why does it seem to belong to the mother of your girlfriend?
No one knows the story except you. If you want a reasonable answer, you have to explain it accordingly.
Although you are the owner, however, she is the owner. You or your mother only has the right to sell him. Whether you get a punishment for it I do not know. She could say that she acted out of emotions and it was not meant seriously. However, I think you would lose.
said to me several times that I can sell the laptop.
I think because of the "several times" you should be sure.
No man. What are you talking about? Haha do not say you have studied legal knowledge. If she said 1000x I would give you the lappi and he would say no or do not care then i'm NOT the owner. In addition, higher sums are needed for bps. Donation of a car (how not now how much the lappi is worth) a notarization of the notary to make the donation effective. Something is in the bgb in there look in there and do not kiddie hopes unnecessarily by your quarter of knowledge
Huh? 1. I NEVER said that he is an owner
Although you are the owner, however, she is the owner
Notarization of the notary to make the donation effective
Not with a laptop.
You said that the WIFE has said that I want to LOST it to you in court. That does not seem like he's THE OWNER. What are you talking about? Or did you want to say that the court would forcibly sanction the woman? Young boy please questioner do not listen to the haha.
Ey I write now an answer to the questioner with §§ so just take care.
How you talk like an ignorant little boy. "HÄÄ I did not say that" "EYY I do that now" I do not quite understand what you want to say if you want to write a review now then you can also write it publicly here under the comment then I can get your wundewerk then synonymous look at
So I researched and I have the right answer.
To get to the point, you're right.
She said yes: "told me several times that I can sell the laptop"
As she said, one can and must assume that she no longer wanted the laptop.
§ 959 BGB abandonment of property
"A movable thing will be abandoned if the owner gives up possession of the property with the intention of renouncing the property."
That's exactly what happened. She deliberately renounced her laptop. You can now sleep in the evening.
Look at my answer and leave your opinion.
On this basis, you can't accept a dereliction. A will to renounce can be accepted if the owner of the thing was unaffected by the legal fate of the thing (see Staudinger-Gursky / Wiegand, § 959 marginal 3). The explanation that one could sell the laptop but opens up a variety of interpretation options. For example, this statement could also be interpreted as an application for the conclusion of an order for the sale of the laptop on behalf of the mother. Then the mother does not care less about the fate of the cause, because a possible contract of sale between a third party and her comes about, which is known to include the obligation to procure property. Would she give up the property they would gem. § 311a Civil Code liability for damages. That certainly can't be wanted, §§ 133, 157.
Thank you
