Haven't found a better igpus yet.
Yes, but I would wait for the 4000 models, because you have the real power. They should come out soon, at least I'm still waiting and then strike later!
Until now yes. The upcoming Ryzen 4000s will change that
I would generally not recommend an amd, because the power consumption is too high for me and it does not offer the necessary power like Intel.
I would put 100 euro on it and get Intel, but as I said, that's just my opinion.
What year are you from? 2012? Yes, the Bulldozer processors were small power guzzlers that tried to score at high clock rates, but were still weak in terms of performance.
Today's Intel is now the AMD from back then. They are now trying to attract people with high clock rates and can guess what it will make itself felt, right! The processors are now becoming real hot heads, see the I9 9900k, which tries to bend and break to get the 5 Ghz stable, which also requires an additional potent air cooler solution or even better an AIO water cooling and that will all change End will make itself felt on the electricity bill.
AMD Intel is pretty close on the heels when it comes to single-core performance, but when it comes to multi-core performance and the configuration with more cores, AMD is far superior.
The Ryzen 5 3500U is still the best CPU up to 500 euro, although in some cases you can even get the Ryzen 7 3700U, which clocks even higher.
Now only the new 4000 generation processors need to come out and other processors in this price range will turn out to be the best.
Overall, the 3500u is better than the Ryzen7 3700u
Amd is intel close on the heels but only close and not outdated!
my opinion is clear, I tend to Intel because Intel is simply the better, yes performance technically everything runs much cleaner.
the additional components you need to cool Intel then of course more Storm but still not like Amd solo.
Believe me, I know what I'm talking about.
Amd is intel close on the heels but only close and not outdated!
It currently looks very bleak for Intel and has been largely replaced by AMD. Of course, Intel still offers the slightly better single core performance, but what surcharge you have to put down only gets around 10 more performance.
my opinion is clear, I tend to Intel because Intel is simply the better, yes performance technically everything runs much cleaner.
Can you do Nobody said that Intel was bad, they just have nothing to counter AMD at the moment.
the additional components you need to cool Intel then of course more Storm but still not like Amd solo.
The only inhumanly high power consumption that I can think of now would be the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X with 280 watts which has to supply 64 cores and 128 threads with enough energy. For the best processor for the casual user, the Ryzen 9 3990X with 16 cores and 32 threads would have a TDP of 105 watts.
Believe me, I know what I'm talking about.
I'm just getting more and more confused about what year or decade we're talking about that AMD was so bad.