I would like to buy a new work device in the near future, this time it will be a laptop or convertible.
I found a device from HP that uses the same hardware. Only the processor and the graphics unit differ.
https://www.notebooksbilliger.de/...8ng+677129 device
https://www.notebooksbilliger.de/...7ng+660145 device
I would use the notebook for office applications as well as Internet applications and for occasional image editing. However, I do a lot of multitasking and work with several screens at the same time (I'm aware that I need a dock).
I see the advantage of the Intel in the almost 2 hours longer battery life, in the case of the AMD in the performance. Which device would you advise me to use?
I don't know how Intel fares against AMD in general, but I have an HP convertible with an i5 and I'm not that convinced of its performance
Thanks for your answer! Do you happen to know which model you have? And what exactly bothers you about this device?
However, this is not due to Intel but the general performance of low-priced notebooks which you will probably have, the notebook that was linked has quite a bit of power under the hood.
As far as mobilcpus are concerned, I would always advise Intel, simply because they give less power for more power, that means the battery lasts longer with more power.
In practice that makes no difference whether AMD / Intel I have been working in the IT industry for 25 years. For large companies, depending on the approval, it is crucial that they do not want to grow wild in the company.
If you can decide for yourself it doesn't matter.
I have a Lenovo T15 with an Intel chip / graphics. And I'm very satisfied, but I can only use the notebook screen and a 27 "QHD display.
I have the Lenovo USB-C docking, let's say 3rd screen (notebook display +2 monitors) no longer works. Even a TB used as a test did not bring any improvement.
Otherwise I would advise you to have a notebook / desktop with a proper separate graphics card.
It is also important to have a working memory of at least 16 GB, because the new notebooks can only be upgraded to a limited extent because the case has to be opened.
Has been with the 4000 Ryzen, are now about the same.
Hehe, "it's been 25 years". This is a mistake, as a dyslexic I can well understand.
If the decision is only made between the two models, then clearly the model with the Intel CPU.
Because you won't notice any difference in performance in everyday life, but the Intel model has a much better, brighter panel and that's a big difference.
The rest is not included in the decision, since the devices are otherwise almost identically equipped. The Wi-Fi module in the Intel is even better, but you can upgrade it for little money.
They both take absolutely nothing. The battery life that is stated can't be relied on anyway. It should be about the same with both CPUs, and probably (slightly) longer with Intel.
I would ask if the Intel model really has a 400 nit panel if you don't want to only use external screens. 250 nits are not enough in this price range, which is also available with entry-level devices.
Both offer enough performance, Intel more in everyday life and AMD maybe a little more when editing images, if the program can use all cores.
