Which of the perfomance for a notebook is best suited by the two linked hard drives?
(Please answer professional answers and only with knowledge!)
SanDisk: https://www.amazon.de/...01F9G43WU/
Crucial: https://www.amazon.de/...07G3YNLJB/
The Sandisk Plus I hate like the plague.
If then an Ultra II from San Disk.
The access times were really bad etc.
But unfortunately I have no experience with the BX500.
Think it's jacket like pants.
It does not matter which one you take, both are good and will do many years of service. Take the SSD you like. The plates are on the same standard.
They are about the same level. Whether Sandisk or Crucial, both have better ssds for a few euro more.
The Sandisk Plus was totally lousy anyway. If she was able to test it XD sent it back immediately.
Can I say nothing? But I have here a 480 Sandisk, I could finally install (but the model just does not know).
But I had the BX for a while as a system disk - boy, that is… On the one hand already as fast as one expects of an SSD, on the other hand constantly inexplicable hangers (presumably whenever the internal cache overflowed), that it was no longer beautiful, even on the desktop.
Now I have windows on a Samsung, nothing more with hangers.
The BX is looking at me sadly from the table at the moment.
Constantly inexplicable hangers
something like that happened to me with the Sandisk Plus.
They were just unexplainable hangers and even if you started an installation, it took a little while until it started.
The access time was also not very good what a program had confirmed.
Of course that was even worlds better than a HDD and who has never had an SSD will miss anything. But whoever had a faster SSD before will definitely miss the SSD!
