I just realized that +16GB of RAM for my laptop costs 151 euro. I would end up with 32 GB. If I were to buy the same laptop with 32 GB of RAM, I would pay +300 euro. Something similar with the SSD.
So is it always cheaper to upgrade the hardware of the laptop instead of buying it directly with the hardware?
It depends, it is usually cheaper to build yourself. They want to make money too (the finished pc workers)
But I'm talking about my laptop, where I can only upgrade the RAM and the SSD.
And? It boils down to the fact that you have to pay more
The only things you can upgrade to regular laptops are RAM and hard drives. I would upgrade it, but if you need more computing power then you just have to buy a new one with a better processor and graphics card.
Better buy a PC then. Upgrading is generally cheaper than buying new I think
It's not about whether it's a laptop or a PC.
What I mean by that is that it is better to buy a PC while you upgrade
I know, but that's not the point.
What use is a PC to him if, for example, he wants to work on the go?
You also don't recommend motorcycles when someone is looking for a car.
But did I not answer the question? You asked if it was cheaper to buy or upgrade hardware. Said upgrading is cheaper?
Naturally
But YOU referred to PCs, but I was interested in notebooks.
It's cheaper to upgrade laptops. OK?
As you can see for yourself, it is cheaper to upgrade yourself.
So it's a question of money. However, that doesn't change the fact that you have the same system according to your own statements, so why spend 300 euro more.