Is that right in 16: 9
4.5 "smartphone 720p
8-9 "Tablet 1080p
13 "laptop 1440p
25 "PC monitor 2160p
80 "TV 4320p
perfect terminals for the human resolution and the Ergnomie are?
A table is the wrong way to go. Everything on a display (no matter how big) exactly as sharp, colorfast and true to detail as in direct comparison to the original, is "perfect".
otherwise we're content with compromise. In the long era of tube color television, has anyone ever complained that they had a grotesquely disintegrating (with today's scale)?
but most people who spend days worrying about whether this or that resolution would be the best, forget very quickly at home on the pc or in front of the television that they have thought about it and possibly spent too much money, if the film is exciting or the game ties.
The pixel count increases with increasing display size only because it is easier (and cheaper) to accommodate many pixels in large displays than in small ones.
For sharpness you have to look at the distance between eye and display. The resolution of our eye is not tied to a pixel number, but the sharpness is determined inter alia. By the angle that two pixels form with the eye.
For example, e.g. A device with 10 '' and 1000 pixels at a distance of 1m as sharp as one with 30 '' and 1000 pixels at a distance of 3m (assuming the same technology and quality). The set of rays from the math lesson sends greetings.
If your mentioned sizes were perfect, there would be no devices with much higher resolution in the respective segment. But there's.