I came across a Razer notebook for 570 euro and wonder if the purchase would be worthwhile.
The following components are installed:
Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7 7500u 13.3 inches, 128GB SSD, 8GB Ram, 2 years old.
Not worth it for 570 and even 2 years old for the money you get a brand new with the same or better components
Not worth it, for less money you get something better new
Where can I get a new one for the same price? The new ones still cost over 1000 euro.
No. This laptop is not suitable for gambling.
There was saved on the graphics card. Even a GT 1030 is better. You will not have fun with it.
The SSD is too small. With 128 GB a gamer is not enough.
With a 13.3 inch screen you will not have fun.
Since outdated DDR3 Ram was installed. DDR4 is already outside.
Everywhere you get that. Just not exactly this.
https://m.notebooksbilliger.de/hp+15+da0103ng
The costs every two weeks 444 euro and is definitely at least as good. But are 15 inches.
570 euro for the components is just too expensive for a used notebook, which will probably soon die of heat death.
I would never want the HP. Too bulky, no QHD dislay, no Thunderbolt, plastic bomber, worse quality.
Any number of graphics cards can be connected. So no problem.
The HP is far worse. Too bulky, no QHD dislay, no Thunderbolt, plastic bomber, worse quality.
Where are you looking?
For what does one necessarily need a QHD display? Only worsens the performance. For 100 euro more you also get which are thinner. Besides, you did not even link yours…
If you really want all that, buy a MacBook Pro 13 from 2015 for about 600 euro. I think Thunderbolt is unnecessary. And the notebook is and remains too expensive. If you think it suits it, buy it, but I would not get it.
Who really needs QHD or Thunderbolt…
The built-in CPU, and the graphics chip of the HP device are a lot better than in this Razer device (if in the Razer, as I suspect, the Intel HD Graphics 620 is installed).
Likewise, the RAM is better.
The HP device: DDR4, 2400 MHz
Razor device: DDR3, 1866 MHz
And if I read correctly, the HP device has an IPS panel and the Razer device has a TFT panel.
Unless I compare the right device, of course - is unfortunately not angegbeen.
And it depends on what you prefer.
As for the inner workings (construction, etc.), I can't say anything about that, because I do not have the two devices from me.
And to the dimension:
HP device: 20 x 335 x 234
Razer device: 13.1 x 321 x 206
Height x width x depth (in mm).
Mass:
HP device: 1.47 Kg
Razer device: 1.3 Kg
A little bigger and heavier is the HP product.
Purely in terms of components, I would prefer the HP device, although I'm not a fan of HP.
The device from Razer has just Thunderbolt (which I do not need), a QHD screen (which I also do not need, especially not with this rather poor performance) and a touch screen (which would be pretty nice).
Since I take the additional 0.69 mm height, 14mm width, 28mm depth and 0.17 kg in purchase.
You can connect a graphics card, thanks to Thunderbolt 3, that's true, however:
Through Thunderbolt 3 get ever a loss of performance.
The weak CPU will most likely slow down the graphics card, whichever you choose.
A dock costs 600 euro and is therefore overpriced.
